Chad Dowell v. The Kroger Company

841 F.2d 1125, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 3032, 1988 WL 20191
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided March 9, 1988·No. 87-1010·Unpublished

Opinion

841 F.2d 1125

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Chad DOWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
The KROGER COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee

No. 87-1010.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 9, 1988.

Before ENGEL, MERRITT and KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judges

ORDER

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

The court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be, and it hereby is, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chad Dowell v. The Kroger Company, 841 F.2d 1125, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 3032, 1988 WL 20191 (6th Cir. 1988).

841 F.2d 1125 (Chad Dowell v. The Kroger Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Eisen (Saul) v. United States
841 F.2d 1125 (Sixth Circuit, 1988)