Chace v. Liepshutz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Chace v. Liepshutz

258 A.D. 1029, 17 N.Y.S.2d 884, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8689

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 25, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 258 A.D. 1029 (Chace v. Liepshutz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chace v. Liepshutz, 258 A.D. 1029, 17 N.Y.S.2d 884, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8689 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

In 1934 a judgment for $1,474.07 in an action upon a promissory note was recovered by plaintiff against appellant Harold Liepshutz and his father, Samuel Liepshutz. This appeal is from an order denying a motion to set aside the judgment upon the ground that process was not served upon appellant. The proof before the Special Term indicated that service was made. Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Bliss, Heffernan, Schenek and Foster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In 1934 a judgment for $1,474.07 in an action upon a promissory note was recovered by plaintiff against appellant Harold Liepshutz and his father, Samuel Liepshutz. This appeal is from an order denying a motion to set aside the judgment upon the ground that process was not served upon appellant. The proof before the Special Term indicated that service was made. Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Bliss, Heffernan, Schenek and Foster, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 A.D. 1029, 17 N.Y.S.2d 884, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chace-v-liepshutz-nyappdiv-1940.