Chace v. Benham

12 Wend. 200
New York Supreme Court·Decided August 7, 1834·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

Nelson, J.

The objection cannot prevail in this case ; the defendant, who has suffered a default, has no interest in this motion ; he cannot call witnesses on the trial, and therefore the convenience of his witnesses cannot be urged as an objection to the motion; all he can do is to cross-examine the plaintiff’s witnesses.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chace v. Benham, 12 Wend. 200 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1834).

12 Wend. 200 (Chace v. Benham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sherman v. Gregory
42 How. Pr. 481 (New York Supreme Court, 1872)