Chace v. Benham

12 Wend. 200
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 7, 1834
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 12 Wend. 200 (Chace v. Benham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chace v. Benham, 12 Wend. 200 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1834).

Opinion

By the Court,

Nelson, J.

The objection cannot prevail in this case ; the defendant, who has suffered a default, has no interest in this motion ; he cannot call witnesses on the trial, and therefore the convenience of his witnesses cannot be urged as an objection to the motion; all he can do is to cross-examine the plaintiff’s witnesses.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sherman v. Gregory
42 How. Pr. 481 (New York Supreme Court, 1872)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 Wend. 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chace-v-benham-nysupct-1834.