Chabble v. O'Neal

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Chabble v. O'Neal

92 S.E. 288, 19 Ga. App. 809, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 373

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 25, 1917

Docket8112

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 92 S.E. 288 (Chabble v. O'Neal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chabble v. O'Neal, 92 S.E. 288, 19 Ga. App. 809, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 373 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Eloodworth, J.

1. “Exception to a judgment overruling a demurrer to the petition, or motion to dismiss a ease for the reason that the petition is insufficient in law, can not properly be made the ground of a motion for a new trial.” Gillis v. Powell, 129 Ga. 403 (58 S. E. 1051); Leathers v. Leathers, 132 Ga. 211 (2) (63 S. E. 1118).

2. This case appears from the record to be absolutely without merit, evidencing the fact that it was brought here for delay only; and the motion of the defendant in error, that the statutory penalty of ten per cent, damages be awarded against the plaintiff in error, is granted.

Judgment affirmed,, with damages.

Broyles, P. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI