Chabad-Lubavitch of Michigan v. Dr Dov Schuchman

CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedMay 20, 2015
Docket149567
StatusPublished

This text of Chabad-Lubavitch of Michigan v. Dr Dov Schuchman (Chabad-Lubavitch of Michigan v. Dr Dov Schuchman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chabad-Lubavitch of Michigan v. Dr Dov Schuchman, (Mich. 2015).

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

May 20, 2015 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

149567 & (55)(60) Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano CHABAD-LUBAVITCH OF MICHIGAN, and Richard H. Bernstein, CONGREGATION BETH CHABAD, Justices Plaintiffs-Appellees, Cross-Appellants, v SC: 149567 COA: 312037 Oakland CC: 2012-126333-CH DR. DOV SCHUCHMAN, KEN KOHN, DORENE SOBCZAK, NEIL CRAFT, ANDREA FEUEREISEN, DALE GOODMAN, LEAH RUBY, ELIMELECH SILBERBERG, SARA TUGMAN BAIS CHABAD TORAH, and CONGREGATION BAIS CHABAD OF WEST BLOOMFIELD, Defendants-Appellants, Cross-Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the May 22, 2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals because there are no grounds on which to equitably toll the statute of limitations. MCL 600.5827 and MCL 600.5829 govern the accrual of the plaintiffs’ claims. The statutory scheme is exclusive, and neither statute contains a provision to toll the period of limitations. See Trentadue v Buckler Automatic Lawn Sprinkler Co, 479 Mich 378 (2007). The application for leave to appeal as cross- appellants is considered, and it is DENIED as moot.

BERNSTEIN, J., not participating.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. May 20, 2015 t0513 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Trentadue v. Buckler Automatic Lawn Sprinkler Company
479 Mich. 378 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Chabad-Lubavitch of Michigan v. Dr Dov Schuchman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chabad-lubavitch-of-michigan-v-dr-dov-schuchman-mich-2015.