Chaar v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Chaar v. State

685 So. 2d 1037, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 124, 1997 WL 11545

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 15, 1997·No. No. 96-985·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order denying appellant Bilal M. Chaar’s petition for writ of coram nobis is affirmed. In 1987 Chaar pled nolo contende-re to possession of cocaine and drug paraphernalia, and successfully completed a period of probation. Under threat of deportation proceeding's, Chaar departed from the United States and has been denied reentry. He petitioned for coram nobis, seeking to vacate his plea on the ground that he did not know the plea would render him ineligible for reentry. We affirm the trial court’s denial of relief on authority of State v. Ginebra, 511 So.2d 960 (Fla.1987)1; see also State v. Fox, 659 So.2d 1324 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), review denied, 668 So.2d 602 (Fla.1996).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The order denying appellant Bilal M. Chaar’s petition for writ of coram nobis is affirmed. In 1987 Chaar pled nolo contende-re to possession of cocaine and drug paraphernalia, and successfully completed a period of probation. Under threat of deportation proceeding's, Chaar departed from the United States and has been denied reentry. He petitioned for coram nobis, seeking to vacate his plea on the ground that he did not know the plea would render him ineligible for reentry. We affirm the trial court’s denial of relief on authority of State v. Ginebra, 511 So.2d 960 (Fla.1987)1; see also State v. Fox, 659 So.2d 1324 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), review denied, 668 So.2d 602 (Fla.1996).

Affirmed.

Chaar v. State, 685 So. 2d 1037, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 124, 1997 WL 11545 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

685 So. 2d 1037 (Chaar v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related