Chaapel v. Cochran

Supreme Court

Chaapel v. Cochran

369 U.S. 869

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMay 14, 1962

DocketNo. 602

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 369 U.S. 869 (Chaapel v. Cochran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chaapel v. Cochran, 369 U.S. 869 (1962).

Pincite

Opinion

This motion for leave to file an application for a writ of habeas corpus is hereby transferred “for hearing and determination” to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. 28 U. S. C. § 2241 (b); Rule 31 (5), Revised Rules of the Supreme Court of the United States (1954); Ex parte Abernathy, 320 U. S. 219.

Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or disposition of this motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This motion for leave to file an application for a writ of habeas corpus is hereby transferred “for hearing and determination” to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. 28 U. S. C. § 2241 (b); Rule 31 (5), Revised Rules of the Supreme Court of the United States (1954); Ex parte Abernathy, 320 U. S. 219.

Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or disposition of this motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

369 U.S. 869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chaapel-v-cochran-scotus-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack