Chaapel v. Cochran

Supreme Court

Chaapel v. Cochran

369 U.S. 869

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 14, 1962·No. No. 602·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

This motion for leave to file an application for a writ of habeas corpus is hereby transferred “for hearing and determination” to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. 28 U. S. C. § 2241 (b); Rule 31 (5), Revised Rules of the Supreme Court of the United States (1954); Ex parte Abernathy, 320 U. S. 219.

Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or disposition of this motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This motion for leave to file an application for a writ of habeas corpus is hereby transferred “for hearing and determination” to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. 28 U. S. C. § 2241 (b); Rule 31 (5), Revised Rules of the Supreme Court of the United States (1954); Ex parte Abernathy, 320 U. S. 219.

Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or disposition of this motion.

Chaapel v. Cochran, 369 U.S. 869 (1962).

Pincite

369 U.S. 869 (Chaapel v. Cochran) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related