Cgi Technologies and Solutions v. Rhonda Rose
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CGI TECHNOLOGIES AND SOLUTIONS No. 11-35127 INC., in its capacity as sponsor and fiduciary for CGI Technologies and D.C. No. Solutions, Inc. Welfare Benefit Plan, 2:10-cv-00298-
Plaintiff-Appellee, RSM
v.
RHONDA ROSE; NELSON LANGER ENGLE PLLC, Defendants-Appellants.
CGI TECHNOLOGIES AND SOLUTIONS No. 11-35128 INC., in its capacity as sponsor and fiduciary for CGI Technologies and D.C. No. Solutions, Inc. Welfare Benefit Plan, 2:10-cv-00298-
Plaintiff-Appellant, RSM
v.
ORDER
RHONDA ROSE; NELSON LANGER ENGLE PLLC, Defendants-Appellees.
2 CGI TECH . AND SOLUTIONS, INC. V . ROSE
On Remand From The United States Supreme Court
Filed August 16, 2013
Before: Mary M. Schroeder and Ronald M. Gould, Circuit Judges, and Ralph R. Beistline, Chief District Judge.*
ORDER
We vacate the district court’s order and remand this case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with US Airways, Inc. v. McCutchen, 133 S. Ct. 1537, 569 U.S.___ (2013).
*
The Honorable Ralph R. Beistline, Chief District Judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska, sitting by designation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cgi Technologies and Solutions v. Rhonda Rose (Cgi Technologies and Solutions v. Rhonda Rose) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.