Cgi Technologies and Solutions v. Rhonda Rose

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 16, 2013·No. 11-35127·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CGI TECHNOLOGIES AND SOLUTIONS No. 11-35127 INC., in its capacity as sponsor and fiduciary for CGI Technologies and D.C. No. Solutions, Inc. Welfare Benefit Plan, 2:10-cv-00298-

Plaintiff-Appellee, RSM

v.

RHONDA ROSE; NELSON LANGER ENGLE PLLC, Defendants-Appellants.

CGI TECHNOLOGIES AND SOLUTIONS No. 11-35128 INC., in its capacity as sponsor and fiduciary for CGI Technologies and D.C. No. Solutions, Inc. Welfare Benefit Plan, 2:10-cv-00298-

Plaintiff-Appellant, RSM

v.

ORDER

RHONDA ROSE; NELSON LANGER ENGLE PLLC, Defendants-Appellees.

2 CGI TECH . AND SOLUTIONS, INC. V . ROSE

On Remand From The United States Supreme Court

Filed August 16, 2013

Before: Mary M. Schroeder and Ronald M. Gould, Circuit Judges, and Ralph R. Beistline, Chief District Judge.*

ORDER

We vacate the district court’s order and remand this case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with US Airways, Inc. v. McCutchen, 133 S. Ct. 1537, 569 U.S.___ (2013).

*

The Honorable Ralph R. Beistline, Chief District Judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska, sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cgi Technologies and Solutions v. Rhonda Rose, (9th Cir. 2013).

Cgi Technologies and Solutions v. Rhonda Rose (Cgi Technologies and Solutions v. Rhonda Rose) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

U.S. Airways, Inc. v. McCutchen
133 S. Ct. 1537 (Supreme Court, 2013)