C.G., a Juvenile v. State of Florida
This text of C.G., a Juvenile v. State of Florida (C.G., a Juvenile v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed August 27, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D24-1813 Lower Tribunal No. J23-1116 ________________
C.G., a juvenile, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Orlando A. Prescott, Judge.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender and Andrew Stanton, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General and Lourdes B. Fernandez, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before EMAS, MILLER and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
C.G. appeals from a withhold of adjudication of delinquency and probation order based upon the trial court’s finding that he was guilty of the
crime of burglary of a dwelling with intent to commit an assault or battery
therein. We reverse.
Burglary is “[e]ntering a dwelling, a structure, or a conveyance with
the intent to commit an offense therein, unless the premises are at the time
open to the public or the defendant is licensed or invited to enter.” §
810.02(1)(b)1., Fla. Stat. (2023). “To prove burglary, the State must
establish the juvenile’s intent to commit an offense at the time he enters the
dwelling, structure, or conveyance.” L.A.H. v. State, 197 So. 3d 1265, 1267
(Fla. 2d DCA 2016) (citing J.J.D. v. State, 973 So. 2d 1254, 1255 (Fla. 2d
DCA 2008) (determining that the State failed to show that the juvenile
entered the dwelling with the intent to commit an offense inside)).
Here, the evidence was insufficient to establish the crime of burglary
where the State did not present evidence of intent to commit an offense
therein when C.G. entered the yard. Still, the evidence was sufficient to
support a finding that C.G. committed the necessarily lesser included
offense of simple battery, and he admits as much. Accordingly, we reverse
and remand for a reduction of the charge to battery and for a new
disposition hearing.
Reversed and remanded with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
C.G., a Juvenile v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cg-a-juvenile-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2025.