C.G., a Juvenile v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 27, 2025
Docket3D2024-1813
StatusPublished

This text of C.G., a Juvenile v. State of Florida (C.G., a Juvenile v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
C.G., a Juvenile v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed August 27, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D24-1813 Lower Tribunal No. J23-1116 ________________

C.G., a juvenile, Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Orlando A. Prescott, Judge.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender and Andrew Stanton, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General and Lourdes B. Fernandez, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, MILLER and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

C.G. appeals from a withhold of adjudication of delinquency and probation order based upon the trial court’s finding that he was guilty of the

crime of burglary of a dwelling with intent to commit an assault or battery

therein. We reverse.

Burglary is “[e]ntering a dwelling, a structure, or a conveyance with

the intent to commit an offense therein, unless the premises are at the time

open to the public or the defendant is licensed or invited to enter.” §

810.02(1)(b)1., Fla. Stat. (2023). “To prove burglary, the State must

establish the juvenile’s intent to commit an offense at the time he enters the

dwelling, structure, or conveyance.” L.A.H. v. State, 197 So. 3d 1265, 1267

(Fla. 2d DCA 2016) (citing J.J.D. v. State, 973 So. 2d 1254, 1255 (Fla. 2d

DCA 2008) (determining that the State failed to show that the juvenile

entered the dwelling with the intent to commit an offense inside)).

Here, the evidence was insufficient to establish the crime of burglary

where the State did not present evidence of intent to commit an offense

therein when C.G. entered the yard. Still, the evidence was sufficient to

support a finding that C.G. committed the necessarily lesser included

offense of simple battery, and he admits as much. Accordingly, we reverse

and remand for a reduction of the charge to battery and for a new

disposition hearing.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

L.A.H. v. State
197 So. 3d 1265 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
J.J.D. v. State
973 So. 2d 1254 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
C.G., a Juvenile v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cg-a-juvenile-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2025.