CFM of Connecticut, Inc. v. Chowdhury

667 A.2d 1270, 235 Conn. 933, 1995 Conn. LEXIS 454
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided December 4, 1995·No. SC 15334·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 38 Conn. App. 745 (AC 12406), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, on March 18, 1993, the trial court, Holzberg, J., lacked jurisdiction to vacate the contempt order of the trial court, Susco, J., dated August 31, 1990?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CFM of Connecticut, Inc. v. Chowdhury, 667 A.2d 1270, 235 Conn. 933, 1995 Conn. LEXIS 454 (Colo. 1995).

667 A.2d 1270 (CFM of Connecticut, Inc. v. Chowdhury) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Salmon
735 A.2d 333 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1999)
CFM of Connecticut, Inc. v. Chowdhury
685 A.2d 1108 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1996)