CFI Sales & Marketing, Ltd. v. Florida Marlins Baseball, Ltd.
This text of 837 So. 2d 423 (CFI Sales & Marketing, Ltd. v. Florida Marlins Baseball, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On this appeal of a final judgment in a contract action, we find no abuse of discretion in the evidentiary challenges brought. Moreover, we conclude that the record contains substantial and competent evidence to support the trial court’s findings and we accordingly affirm as to the other issues without discussion. See Adkins v. Adkins, 650 So.2d 61, 62 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994) (stating that: “so long as there is sufficient evidence in the record to support the findings, we are required to affirm the final judgment appealed from James Driscoll, Inc. v. Gould, 521 So.2d 301 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) (“where there is competent substantial evidence to support the trial court’s conclusions, reviewing court must affirm”).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
837 So. 2d 423, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 3563, 2002 WL 428247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cfi-sales-marketing-ltd-v-florida-marlins-baseball-ltd-fladistctapp-2002.