CFI Sales & Marketing, Ltd. v. Florida Marlins Baseball, Ltd.

837 So. 2d 423, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 3563, 2002 WL 428247
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 20, 2002·No. No. 3D01-1789·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On this appeal of a final judgment in a contract action, we find no abuse of discretion in the evidentiary challenges brought. Moreover, we conclude that the record contains substantial and competent evidence to support the trial court’s findings and we accordingly affirm as to the other issues without discussion. See Adkins v. Adkins, 650 So.2d 61, 62 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994) (stating that: “so long as there is sufficient evidence in the record to support the findings, we are required to affirm the final judgment appealed from James Driscoll, Inc. v. Gould, 521 So.2d 301 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) (“where there is competent substantial evidence to support the trial court’s conclusions, reviewing court must affirm”).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CFI Sales & Marketing, Ltd. v. Florida Marlins Baseball, Ltd., 837 So. 2d 423, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 3563, 2002 WL 428247 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

837 So. 2d 423 (CFI Sales & Marketing, Ltd. v. Florida Marlins Baseball, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fernandez v. City of Miami
147 So. 3d 553 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
McCormick v. Cox
118 So. 3d 980 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Mitchell v. Higgs
61 So. 3d 1152 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)