Cezar v. Smith

Fourth Circuit

Cezar v. Smith

204 F. App'x 325

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 14, 2006·No. No. 06-1266·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Bart D. Cezar appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint alleging a violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order, which is modified to reflect that Appellee’s motion to dismiss was converted into a motion for summary judgment. See Cezar v. Smith, No. 1:04-cv-03966-JFM (D.Md. Jan. 25, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Bart D. Cezar appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint alleging a violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order, which is modified to reflect that Appellee’s motion to dismiss was converted into a motion for summary judgment. See Cezar v. Smith, No. 1:04-cv-03966-JFM (D.Md. Jan. 25, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

Cezar v. Smith, 204 F. App'x 325 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

204 F. App'x 325 (Cezar v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related