Cezair v. State

769 So. 2d 1135, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13527, 2000 WL 1531770
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 18, 2000·No. No. 3D00-2102·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. King v. State, 754 So.2d 85 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Mathis v. State, 720 So.2d 1116 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Simmons v. State, 684 So.2d 860 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Dawson-Knapp v. State, 679 So.2d 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Griffis v. State, 593 So.2d 308 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cezair v. State, 769 So. 2d 1135, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 13527, 2000 WL 1531770 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

769 So. 2d 1135 (Cezair v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Griffis v. State
593 So. 2d 308 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
King v. State
754 So. 2d 85 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Dawson-Knapp v. State
679 So. 2d 1 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Mathis v. State
720 So. 2d 1116 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Simmons v. State
684 So. 2d 860 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)