Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Cetma Jet, Inc. v. Torres

Cetma Jet, Inc. v. Torres

787 So. 2d 960, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8052, 2001 WL 649326
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 13, 2001
DocketNo. 3D00-1968
StatusPublished

This text of 787 So. 2d 960 (Cetma Jet, Inc. v. Torres) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cetma Jet, Inc. v. Torres, 787 So. 2d 960, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8052, 2001 WL 649326 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In an action for fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach of contract, Cetma Jet, Inc. appeals from a final judgment. We affirm.

In the Asset Purchase Agreement that formed the contractual basis of the sale of Cetma to Aerothrust, Cetma assigned to Aerothrust all rights that arose out of Cetma’s contracts. The claims that Cetma brought against Torres fall within that category, and are thus barred. See W.S. Badcock Corp. v. Webb, 699 So.2d 859 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Escandar v. Southern Mgmt. & Inv. Corp., 534 So.2d 1203 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

WS Badcock Corp. v. Webb
699 So. 2d 859 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Escandar v. Southern Mgmt. & Inv. Corp.
534 So. 2d 1203 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
787 So. 2d 960, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8052, 2001 WL 649326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cetma-jet-inc-v-torres-fladistctapp-2001.