Cestone v. Harkavy
This text of 243 A.D. 732 (Cestone v. Harkavy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action for damages for wrongfully causing death, order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to defendant to answer within ten days from the entry of the order herein. The complaint sufficiently alleges that the operating surgeon was incompetent and unskillful to the knowledge of defendant at the time he selected such surgeon and recommended him to the decedent, and the defendant was, therefore, negligent in so selecting and recommending him. (Stage v. Michigan Central Railroad Co., 199 App. Div. 675, and cases cited.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Johnston, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
243 A.D. 732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cestone-v-harkavy-nyappdiv-1935.