Cespedes v. HBC Florida, Inc.

785 So. 2d 523, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15432, 2000 WL 1745168
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 29, 2000
DocketNo. 3D00-1214
StatusPublished

This text of 785 So. 2d 523 (Cespedes v. HBC Florida, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cespedes v. HBC Florida, Inc., 785 So. 2d 523, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15432, 2000 WL 1745168 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As the trial court concluded, there was no competent evidence that liability could be imposed on the appellee on the sole asserted basis that it was engaged in a joint enterprise with the active tortfeasor. See Kislak v. Kreedian, 95 So.2d 510 (Fla.1957); Russell v. Thielen, 82 So.2d 143 (Fla.1955); Metric Engineering v. Gonzalez, 707 So.2d 354 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), review denied, 718 So.2d 169 (Fla.1998); Florida Tomato Packers, Inc. v. Wilson, 296 So.2d 536 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974), cert. denied, 327 So.2d 32 (Fla.1976). The judgment for the defendant entered on a directed verdict in its favor is therefore

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kislak v. Kreedian
95 So. 2d 510 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1957)
Russell v. Thielen
82 So. 2d 143 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1955)
Florida Tomato Packers v. Wilson
296 So. 2d 536 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Metric Engineering, Inc. v. Gonzalez
707 So. 2d 354 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
785 So. 2d 523, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15432, 2000 WL 1745168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cespedes-v-hbc-florida-inc-fladistctapp-2000.