Cespedes v. HBC Florida, Inc.
This text of 785 So. 2d 523 (Cespedes v. HBC Florida, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As the trial court concluded, there was no competent evidence that liability could be imposed on the appellee on the sole asserted basis that it was engaged in a joint enterprise with the active tortfeasor. See Kislak v. Kreedian, 95 So.2d 510 (Fla.1957); Russell v. Thielen, 82 So.2d 143 (Fla.1955); Metric Engineering v. Gonzalez, 707 So.2d 354 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), review denied, 718 So.2d 169 (Fla.1998); Florida Tomato Packers, Inc. v. Wilson, 296 So.2d 536 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974), cert. denied, 327 So.2d 32 (Fla.1976). The judgment for the defendant entered on a directed verdict in its favor is therefore
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
785 So. 2d 523, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15432, 2000 WL 1745168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cespedes-v-hbc-florida-inc-fladistctapp-2000.