Cesnavicius v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cesnavicius v. State

157 A.D.2d 702, 551 N.Y.S.2d 784, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 440

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 16, 1990

StatusPublished

This text of 157 A.D.2d 702 (Cesnavicius v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cesnavicius v. State, 157 A.D.2d 702, 551 N.Y.S.2d 784, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 440 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to Court of Claims Act § 10 (6) to file a late claim, the defendant State of New York appeals from so much of an order of the Court of Claims (McCabe, J.), dated January 23, 1989, as granted the application of Zita Cesnavicius as conservator of the estate of Frank W. Minardi.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice McCabe at the Court of Claims. Mangano, J. P., Lawrence, Kooper and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to Court of Claims Act § 10 (6) to file a late claim, the defendant State of New York appeals from so much of an order of the Court of Claims (McCabe, J.), dated January 23, 1989, as granted the application of Zita Cesnavicius as conservator of the estate of Frank W. Minardi.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice McCabe at the Court of Claims. Mangano, J. P., Lawrence, Kooper and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 A.D.2d 702, 551 N.Y.S.2d 784, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cesnavicius-v-state-nyappdiv-1990.