Cescily Spikes v. Joshua Smith
This text of Cescily Spikes v. Joshua Smith (Cescily Spikes v. Joshua Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
May 26, 2021 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
162437 Brian K. Zahra David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh CESCILY SPIKES, Elizabeth M. Welch, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices
v SC: 162437 COA: 346524 Wayne CC: 18-005806-NI JOSHUA SMITH and RIZZO ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, Defendants-Appellees, and STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 24, 2020 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. May 26, 2021 a0519 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cescily Spikes v. Joshua Smith, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cescily-spikes-v-joshua-smith-mich-2021.