Cesario v. Dawson

345 So. 2d 1270, 1977 La. App. LEXIS 4739
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedMay 9, 1977
DocketNo. 11496
StatusPublished

This text of 345 So. 2d 1270 (Cesario v. Dawson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cesario v. Dawson, 345 So. 2d 1270, 1977 La. App. LEXIS 4739 (La. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

PONDER, Judge.

This case is before us on a rule to show cause why defendant’s appeal should not be dismissed because the bond was not timely filed.

A judgment in favor of the plaintiff was signed on November 30, 1976. The defendant made a timely application for a new trial, which was denied on December 17,1976. The motion and order for a devol-utive appeal was filed on February 2, 1977, but the appeal bond was not filed until March 28, 1977.

The appeal must be dismissed.

LSA-C.C.P. Article 2087 as amended by Act 201 of 1976 states in part:

“Except as otherwise provided in this article or by other law, an appeal which does not suspend the effect or the execution of an appealable order or judgment may be taken, and the security therefor furnished, within sixty days after:
(2) the court’s refusal to grant a timely application for a new trial, if the applicant is not entitled to notice of such refusal under Article 1914; ”

The order of appeal and the appeal bond must be filed within the sixty day period [1271]*1271allowed by Article 2087. Master Builders of Slidell, Inc. v. Adams, 342 So.2d 1169 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1977). Because the bond was not timely filed, this court is without jurisdiction. LSA-C.C.P. Article 2088.

Defendant claims that Article 2087 as amended is in violation of Article 1 Sections 19 and 221 of the Constitution of 1974. This contention was disposed of in Something Irish Co. v. Rack, 333 So.2d 773 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1976). We adopt the reasoning of the court in that case.

This appeal is therefore dismissed at defendant’s cost.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Something Irish Co. v. Rack
333 So. 2d 773 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1976)
Master Builders of Slidell, Inc. v. Adams
342 So. 2d 1169 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
345 So. 2d 1270, 1977 La. App. LEXIS 4739, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cesario-v-dawson-lactapp-1977.