Cesar v. Holder
This text of Cesar v. Holder (Cesar v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-2350
NESLY CESAR,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: August 18, 2009 Decided: September 2, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Randall L. Johnson, JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Cindy S. Ferrier, Senior Litigation Counsel, Joseph A. O’Connell, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Nesly Cesar, a native and citizen of Haiti, petitions
for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
(“Board”) denying his motion to reopen or reconsider. We have
reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find no abuse of
discretion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2009). Accordingly, we
deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the
Board. In re: Cesar (B.I.A. Nov. 5, 2008). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cesar v. Holder, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cesar-v-holder-ca4-2009.