Cesar v. Holder

Fourth Circuit

Cesar v. Holder

332 F. App'x 26

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 2, 2009·No. No. 08-2350·Published

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Nesly Cesar, a native and citizen of Haiti, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen or reconsider. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find no abuse of discretion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2009). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. In re: Cesar (B.I.A. Nov. 5, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Nesly Cesar, a native and citizen of Haiti, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen or reconsider. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find no abuse of discretion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2009). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. In re: Cesar (B.I.A. Nov. 5, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Cesar v. Holder, 332 F. App'x 26 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

332 F. App'x 26 (Cesar v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related