Cesar Diaz-Frances v. 115 Blanco LLC
This text of Cesar Diaz-Frances v. 115 Blanco LLC (Cesar Diaz-Frances v. 115 Blanco LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-24-00180-CV
Cesar Diaz-Frances, Appellant
v.
115 Blanco LLC, Appellee
FROM THE JUSTICE COURT, PRECINCT 4 OF BLANCO COUNTY NO. EV23-0004, THE HONORABLE H. R. “BOB” RILEY, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On March 18, 2024, this Court received a document from Appellant that this
Court construed as a notice of appeal. On March 19, this Court requested a response from
appellant, asking him to explain how this Court may exercise jurisdiction over this appeal and
informing him that his appeal may be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless he timely
responded and demonstrated jurisdiction. Appellant has filed a response, identifying the
judgment being appealed as a judgment that was signed by the Justice of Peace, Precinct 4, in
July 2023 and attaching a copy of the judgment and a writ of possession that was signed by the
Justice of Peace in August 2023.
“A court of appeals lacks jurisdiction over direct appeals from a justice court.”
Hutchings v. Melrose Acquisition, L.L.C., No. 05-21-00858-CV, 2021 Tex. App. LEXIS 9667, at
*1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Dec. 3, 2021, no pet.) (mem. op.); see generally Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 51.001 (addressing appeals from justice court to county or district court); Tex. R. Civ. P.
506.1–.3 (addressing appeals from justice court to county court). Further, “[t]imely filing of a
notice of appeal is necessary to invoke this Court’s appellate jurisdiction.” Texas Ent. Ass’n v.
Combs, 431 S.W.3d 790, 796 (Tex. App.—Austin 2014, pet. denied); see Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(b)
(stating that appeal is perfected when written notice of appeal is filed). A notice of appeal to this
Court generally must be filed within thirty days after a judgment is signed. Id. R. 26.1; see also
R. 26.1(a) (setting deadline of ninety days after judgment is signed when certain post-judgment
motions are filed); 26.3 (allowing fifteen-day extension of deadline to file notice of appeal).
Here, this Court lacks jurisdiction on direct appeal from the judgment that
appellant seeks to appeal, and even if this Court would have had jurisdiction on direct appeal
from that judgment, appellant’s notice of appeal would be untimely. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1;
see also Tex. R. Civ. P. 506.1 (setting deadlines for appealing judgment from justice court to
county court). We therefore lack jurisdiction over this appeal and dismiss it for want of
jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).
__________________________________________ Rosa Lopez Theofanis, Justice
Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Smith and Theofanis
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: April 5, 2024
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cesar Diaz-Frances v. 115 Blanco LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cesar-diaz-frances-v-115-blanco-llc-texapp-2024.