CESAR A. VILLAZANO vs STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of CESAR A. VILLAZANO vs STATE OF FLORIDA (CESAR A. VILLAZANO vs STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
CESAR A. VILLAZANO,
Petitioner, Case No. 5D22-1421 v. LT Case No. 2007-034013-CFAES
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. ________________________________/
Opinion filed July 1, 2022
Petition for Belated Appeal A Case of Original Jurisdiction.
Cesar A. Villazano, Bowling Green, pro se.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General Tallahassee, and Rebecca Rock McGuigan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Respondent
PER CURIAM.
The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall
be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the February 25, 2022 order denying motion to correct illegal sentence, filed in
Case 2007-034013-CFAES, Volusia County, Florida. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.141(c)(6)(D).
PETITION GRANTED.
LAMBERT, C. J., WALLIS and NARDELLA, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
CESAR A. VILLAZANO vs STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cesar-a-villazano-vs-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2022.