Cervone v. Zurbrick

Sixth Circuit

Cervone v. Zurbrick

84 F.2d 994, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4701

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedApril 15, 1936

DocketNo. 7274

StatusPublished

This text of 84 F.2d 994 (Cervone v. Zurbrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cervone v. Zurbrick, 84 F.2d 994, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4701 (6th Cir. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The court being of opinion that the appellant was given a fair hearing before the Department of Labor on the writ of deportation, that there is sufficient evidence to support the findings of the Secretary of Labor, and that the trial court committed no error in the hearing on the motion to dismiss the writ of habeas corpus, it is ordered that the order of the court dismissing the writ and remanding the appellant to the custody of the immigration authorities be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The court being of opinion that the appellant was given a fair hearing before the Department of Labor on the writ of deportation, that there is sufficient evidence to support the findings of the Secretary of Labor, and that the trial court committed no error in the hearing on the motion to dismiss the writ of habeas corpus, it is ordered that the order of the court dismissing the writ and remanding the appellant to the custody of the immigration authorities be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 F.2d 994, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 4701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cervone-v-zurbrick-ca6-1936.