Cervone v. Cervone

44 A.D.3d 985, 843 N.Y.S.2d 847
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 30, 2007·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Diamond, J.), dated May 15, 2006, which denied his motion for a downward modification of his child support obligation.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

[986] The plaintiff failed to establish a substantial, unanticipated, and unreasonable change in circumstances warranting a reduction in his child support obligation (see Matter of Heyward v Goldman, 23 AD3d 468, 469 [2005]; Morrissey v Morrissey, 259 AD2d 472 [1999]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs motion for a downward modification of his child support obligation. Schmidt, J.P., Skelos, Lifson and Balkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cervone v. Cervone, 44 A.D.3d 985, 843 N.Y.S.2d 847 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

44 A.D.3d 985 (Cervone v. Cervone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gottlieb v. Gottlieb
119 A.D.3d 644 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)