Cervone v. Cervone
This text of 44 A.D.3d 985 (Cervone v. Cervone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Diamond, J.), dated May 15, 2006, which denied his motion for a downward modification of his child support obligation.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
[986]*986The plaintiff failed to establish a substantial, unanticipated, and unreasonable change in circumstances warranting a reduction in his child support obligation (see Matter of Heyward v Goldman, 23 AD3d 468, 469 [2005]; Morrissey v Morrissey, 259 AD2d 472 [1999]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs motion for a downward modification of his child support obligation. Schmidt, J.P., Skelos, Lifson and Balkin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 A.D.3d 985, 843 N.Y.S.2d 847, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cervone-v-cervone-nyappdiv-2007.