Cervini v. Greystone Building Co.

26 A.D.3d 282, 810 N.Y.S.2d 49

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Nelson Roman, J.), entered on or about October 12, 2004, which, to the extent appealed from, denied so much of plaintiffs motion as sought an order striking the answer of defendants Ju Jeung Kim and Greystone Deli and Grocery, arid directed said defendants to appear for depositions by November 10, 2004, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendants demonstrated a reasonable excuse for failing to comply with deposition orders inasmuch as Kim was not fluent in English and thus could not understand the notices forwarded by counsel. Under the circumstances, the court providently exercised its discretion in requiring depositions by a date certain, or the preclusion from offering testimony at trial (see Palmenta v Columbia Univ., 266 AD2d 90 [1999]). Concur— Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Williams and Malone, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cervini v. Greystone Building Co., 26 A.D.3d 282, 810 N.Y.S.2d 49 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

26 A.D.3d 282 (Cervini v. Greystone Building Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Palmenta v. Columbia University
266 A.D.2d 90 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)