Cervetti v. Yankowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cervetti v. Yankowitz

272 A.D.2d 567, 709 N.Y.S.2d 420, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6067

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 30, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 272 A.D.2d 567 (Cervetti v. Yankowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cervetti v. Yankowitz, 272 A.D.2d 567, 709 N.Y.S.2d 420, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6067 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Shapiro, J.), entered November 24, 1999, which, inter alia, awarded the plaintiff temporary exclusive occupancy of the marital residence and temporary custody of the parties’ daughter, and directed him to pay child support in the amount of $85 per week.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The proper remedy for any perceived inequity in a pendente lite award is a speedy trial (see, Berlly v Berlly, 237 AD2d 553; Gianni v Gianni, 172 AD2d 487). In any event, the awards were appropriate. Santucci, J. P., Altman, Krausman and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Shapiro, J.), entered November 24, 1999, which, inter alia, awarded the plaintiff temporary exclusive occupancy of the marital residence and temporary custody of the parties’ daughter, and directed him to pay child support in the amount of $85 per week.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The proper remedy for any perceived inequity in a pendente lite award is a speedy trial (see, Berlly v Berlly, 237 AD2d 553; Gianni v Gianni, 172 AD2d 487). In any event, the awards were appropriate. Santucci, J. P., Altman, Krausman and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 567, 709 N.Y.S.2d 420, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6067, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cervetti-v-yankowitz-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack