Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. Rigby

934 So. 2d 1183, 31 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 639, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 1344, 2006 WL 1699563
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 22, 2006·No. No. SC05-1725·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We originally accepted jurisdiction to review Rigby v. Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London, 907 So.2d 1187 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005), pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3) [1184]*1184of the Florida Constitution. Upon further consideration, we have determined that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, this review proceeding is hereby dismissed.

It is so ordered.

PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. Rigby, 934 So. 2d 1183, 31 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 639, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 1344, 2006 WL 1699563 (Fla. 2006).

934 So. 2d 1183 (Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. Rigby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related