Cerros v New York City Tr. Auth. 2024 NY Slip Op 33116(U) September 6, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 153784/2021 Judge: Mary V. Rosado Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. INDEX NO. 153784/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 162 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/06/2024
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: HON. MARY V. ROSADO PART 33M Justice --------------------------------------------------------------------X INDEX NO. 153784/2021 MAURICIO CERROS, ENMA CERROS, MOTION DATE 08/31/2024 Plaintiff, MOTION SEQ. NO. - - -004 --- -v- NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, THE CITY OF NEW YORK, TULLY CONSTRUCTION CO. DECISION + ORDER ON INC.,WALSH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ll, MOTION LLC,FELDMAN LUMBER-US LBM, LLC,
Defendant. -----------------------------------------------------------------X
NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, METRO POLITAN Third-Party TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, THE CITY OF NEW YORK Index No. 595079/2023
Plaintiff,
-against-
FELDMAN LUMBER-US LBM, LLC
Defendant. ------------------------------------ -----------------------------------------X
The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 004) 122, 123, 124, 125, 126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,147, 150,151,152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158,159,160, 161 were read on this motion to/for CONSOLIDATE/JOIN FOR TRIAL
Upon the foregoing documents, Plaintiffs Mauricio Cerros and Enma Cerros (collectively
"Plaintiffs") motion to consolidate this action with actions pending under Index Numbers
160593/2023 and 160736/2023 is granted.
This is an action alleging injuries arising from violations of the New York Labor Law.
Plaintiff was injured when an allegedly unsecured stack of lumber collapsed and fell on him.
Plaintiff now seeks to consolidate this action with two other actions that he has initiated against
153784(2021 CERROS, MAURICIO vs. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT Page 1 of 6 Motion No. 004
[* 1] 1 of 6 INDEX NO. 153784/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 162 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/06/2024
various other defendants. The other defendants in the actions to be consolidated allegedly supplied
and stacked the lumber which injured Plaintiff.
Plaintiff argues that consolidation here is appropriate as all defendants spread across the
three actions may have played some role in causing Plaintiffs injury. Plaintiff argues that
consolidation will preserve judicial economy and avoid duplicity, delay, and unnecessary costs.
Plaintiff further argues there are common questions of law and fact since all defendants are named
in relation to Plaintiffs accident when the lumber crashed down on him. Plaintiff further argues
there will be no prejudice to any party from consolidation. Hofer Log & Lumber LLC ("Hofer"),
a defendant in the related action bearing index number 160593/2023 filed a partial opposition.
Hofer argues that it does not oppose consolidation but would like an opportunity to depose Plaintiff
on liability and requests the right to depose any other party which has already been deposed.
Safeguard Inc., ("Safeguard") a defendant in the related action bearing index number 160736/2023
filed opposition. Safeguard's opposition is more on the merits of its defense rather than whether
consolidation is proper. Safeguard argues that there is no evidence that it is necessary in the
prosecution of plaintiffs claim and simply argues the multiplicity of actions are a result of a fishing
expedition.
Consolidation is appropriate where it involves the same plaintiff and where the actions
arise from the same incident (Williams v Rockefeller Center Properties, 282 AD2d 285 [1st Dept
200 I]). Further, consolidation is appropriate where the interests of judicial economy will be served
and to avoid inconsistent determinations (Isa Realty Group, LLC v EBM Development Co., 212
AD3d 427 [1st Dept 2023]). The party opposing the motion for consolidation must establish that
it will suffer substantial prejudice from consolidation (id.). Here, all factors weigh in favor of
153784/2021 CERROS, MAURICIO vs. NEWYORK CITY TRANSIT Page 2 of 6 Motion No. 004
2 of 6 [* 2] INDEX NO. 153784/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 162 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/06/2024
consolidating the three actions. Moreover, no party opposmg the motion has demonstrated
substantial prejudice. Therefore, Plaintiffs' motion is granted.
Accordingly, it is hereby,
ORDERED that the motion is granted and the above-captioned action is consolidated in
this Court with Mauricio Cerros and Enma Cerros. vs. Jacobs Engineering New York Inc. et. al.,
Index No. 160593/2023 and Mauricio Cerros and Enma Cerros vs. Safeguard, Inc. et. al, Index
No. 160736/2023, pending in this Court; and it is further
[The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.]
153784/2021 CERROS, MAURICIO vs. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT Page 3 of 6 Motion No. 004
3 of 6 [* 3] INDEX NO. 153784/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 162 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/06/2024
ORDERED that the consolidation shall take place under Index No. 153784/2021 and the
consolidated action shall bear the following caption:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------------X MAURICIO CERROS, ENMA CERROS,
Index No.: 153784/2021 Plaintiffs, -against-
NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, THE CITY OF NEW YORK, TULLY CONSTRUCTION CO., WALSH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY II, FELDMAN LUMBER-US LBM, LLC, JACOBS ENGINEERING NEW YORK INC., JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC., HOOVER TREATED WOOD PRODUCTS, INC., PACIFIC WOOD LAMINATES, INC., SOUTH COAST LUMBER CO., HOFER LOG & LUMBER LLC, HOFER LUMBER INTERNATIONAL PLYWOOD COMPANY LLC, MANKE LUMBER COMPANY, SHERWOOD LUMBER CORPORATION, SHERWOOD LUMBER REIPHOFF SAWMILL, INC., SAFEGUARD, INC., D & M LUMBER PRODUCTS CO., INC., and "ABC CORP.," a fictitious name but intended to be the entity that manufactured and delivered the subject stack/draft of lumber to the subject work site, and "XYZ Corp.," a fictious name but intended to be the entity that manufactured and delivered the subject stack/draft of lumber to the subject work site, Defendants ------------------------------------------------------------------------X NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, THE CITY OF NEW YORK Third-Party Index No.: 595079/2023 Third-Party Plaintiffs, -against-
FELDMAN LUMBER-US LBM, LLC Third-Party Defendants ------------------------------------------------------------------------X
153784/2021 CERROS, MAURICIO vs. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT Page 4 of 6 Motion No. 004
4 of 6 [* 4] INDEX NO. 153784/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 162 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/06/2024
And it is further
ORDERED that the pleadings in the actions hereby consolidated shall stand as the
pleadings in the consolidated action; and it is further
ORDERED that, within 30 days from entry of this order, movant shall serve a copy of this
order with notice of entry on the Clerk of the Court, who shall consolidate the documents in the
actions hereby consolidated and shall mark his records to reflect the consolidation; and it is further
ORDERED that counsel for the movant shall contact the staff of the Clerk of the Court to
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cerros v New York City Tr. Auth. 2024 NY Slip Op 33116(U) September 6, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 153784/2021 Judge: Mary V. Rosado Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. INDEX NO. 153784/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 162 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/06/2024
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: HON. MARY V. ROSADO PART 33M Justice --------------------------------------------------------------------X INDEX NO. 153784/2021 MAURICIO CERROS, ENMA CERROS, MOTION DATE 08/31/2024 Plaintiff, MOTION SEQ. NO. - - -004 --- -v- NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, THE CITY OF NEW YORK, TULLY CONSTRUCTION CO. DECISION + ORDER ON INC.,WALSH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ll, MOTION LLC,FELDMAN LUMBER-US LBM, LLC,
Defendant. -----------------------------------------------------------------X
NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, METRO POLITAN Third-Party TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, THE CITY OF NEW YORK Index No. 595079/2023
Plaintiff,
-against-
FELDMAN LUMBER-US LBM, LLC
Defendant. ------------------------------------ -----------------------------------------X
The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 004) 122, 123, 124, 125, 126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,147, 150,151,152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158,159,160, 161 were read on this motion to/for CONSOLIDATE/JOIN FOR TRIAL
Upon the foregoing documents, Plaintiffs Mauricio Cerros and Enma Cerros (collectively
"Plaintiffs") motion to consolidate this action with actions pending under Index Numbers
160593/2023 and 160736/2023 is granted.
This is an action alleging injuries arising from violations of the New York Labor Law.
Plaintiff was injured when an allegedly unsecured stack of lumber collapsed and fell on him.
Plaintiff now seeks to consolidate this action with two other actions that he has initiated against
153784(2021 CERROS, MAURICIO vs. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT Page 1 of 6 Motion No. 004
[* 1] 1 of 6 INDEX NO. 153784/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 162 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/06/2024
various other defendants. The other defendants in the actions to be consolidated allegedly supplied
and stacked the lumber which injured Plaintiff.
Plaintiff argues that consolidation here is appropriate as all defendants spread across the
three actions may have played some role in causing Plaintiffs injury. Plaintiff argues that
consolidation will preserve judicial economy and avoid duplicity, delay, and unnecessary costs.
Plaintiff further argues there are common questions of law and fact since all defendants are named
in relation to Plaintiffs accident when the lumber crashed down on him. Plaintiff further argues
there will be no prejudice to any party from consolidation. Hofer Log & Lumber LLC ("Hofer"),
a defendant in the related action bearing index number 160593/2023 filed a partial opposition.
Hofer argues that it does not oppose consolidation but would like an opportunity to depose Plaintiff
on liability and requests the right to depose any other party which has already been deposed.
Safeguard Inc., ("Safeguard") a defendant in the related action bearing index number 160736/2023
filed opposition. Safeguard's opposition is more on the merits of its defense rather than whether
consolidation is proper. Safeguard argues that there is no evidence that it is necessary in the
prosecution of plaintiffs claim and simply argues the multiplicity of actions are a result of a fishing
expedition.
Consolidation is appropriate where it involves the same plaintiff and where the actions
arise from the same incident (Williams v Rockefeller Center Properties, 282 AD2d 285 [1st Dept
200 I]). Further, consolidation is appropriate where the interests of judicial economy will be served
and to avoid inconsistent determinations (Isa Realty Group, LLC v EBM Development Co., 212
AD3d 427 [1st Dept 2023]). The party opposing the motion for consolidation must establish that
it will suffer substantial prejudice from consolidation (id.). Here, all factors weigh in favor of
153784/2021 CERROS, MAURICIO vs. NEWYORK CITY TRANSIT Page 2 of 6 Motion No. 004
2 of 6 [* 2] INDEX NO. 153784/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 162 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/06/2024
consolidating the three actions. Moreover, no party opposmg the motion has demonstrated
substantial prejudice. Therefore, Plaintiffs' motion is granted.
Accordingly, it is hereby,
ORDERED that the motion is granted and the above-captioned action is consolidated in
this Court with Mauricio Cerros and Enma Cerros. vs. Jacobs Engineering New York Inc. et. al.,
Index No. 160593/2023 and Mauricio Cerros and Enma Cerros vs. Safeguard, Inc. et. al, Index
No. 160736/2023, pending in this Court; and it is further
[The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.]
153784/2021 CERROS, MAURICIO vs. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT Page 3 of 6 Motion No. 004
3 of 6 [* 3] INDEX NO. 153784/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 162 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/06/2024
ORDERED that the consolidation shall take place under Index No. 153784/2021 and the
consolidated action shall bear the following caption:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------------X MAURICIO CERROS, ENMA CERROS,
Index No.: 153784/2021 Plaintiffs, -against-
NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, THE CITY OF NEW YORK, TULLY CONSTRUCTION CO., WALSH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY II, FELDMAN LUMBER-US LBM, LLC, JACOBS ENGINEERING NEW YORK INC., JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC., HOOVER TREATED WOOD PRODUCTS, INC., PACIFIC WOOD LAMINATES, INC., SOUTH COAST LUMBER CO., HOFER LOG & LUMBER LLC, HOFER LUMBER INTERNATIONAL PLYWOOD COMPANY LLC, MANKE LUMBER COMPANY, SHERWOOD LUMBER CORPORATION, SHERWOOD LUMBER REIPHOFF SAWMILL, INC., SAFEGUARD, INC., D & M LUMBER PRODUCTS CO., INC., and "ABC CORP.," a fictitious name but intended to be the entity that manufactured and delivered the subject stack/draft of lumber to the subject work site, and "XYZ Corp.," a fictious name but intended to be the entity that manufactured and delivered the subject stack/draft of lumber to the subject work site, Defendants ------------------------------------------------------------------------X NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, THE CITY OF NEW YORK Third-Party Index No.: 595079/2023 Third-Party Plaintiffs, -against-
FELDMAN LUMBER-US LBM, LLC Third-Party Defendants ------------------------------------------------------------------------X
153784/2021 CERROS, MAURICIO vs. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT Page 4 of 6 Motion No. 004
4 of 6 [* 4] INDEX NO. 153784/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 162 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/06/2024
And it is further
ORDERED that the pleadings in the actions hereby consolidated shall stand as the
pleadings in the consolidated action; and it is further
ORDERED that, within 30 days from entry of this order, movant shall serve a copy of this
order with notice of entry on the Clerk of the Court, who shall consolidate the documents in the
actions hereby consolidated and shall mark his records to reflect the consolidation; and it is further
ORDERED that counsel for the movant shall contact the staff of the Clerk of the Court to
arrange for the effectuation of the consolidation hereby directed; and it is further
ORDERED that service of this order upon the Clerk of the Court shall be made in hard-
copy format if this action is a hard-copy matter or, if it is an e-filed case, shall be made in
accordance with the procedures set forth in the Protocol on Courthouse and County Clerk
Procedures for Electronically Filed Cases (accessible at the "E-Filing" page on the court's
website); and it is further
ORDERED that, as applicable and insofar as is practical, the Clerk of this Court shall file
the documents being consolidated in the consolidated case file under the index number of the
consolidated action in the New York State Courts Electronic Filing System or make appropriate
notations of such documents in the e-filing records of the court so as to ensure access to the
documents in the consolidated action; and it is further
ORDERED that, within 30 days from entry of this order, movant shall serve a copy of this
order with notice of entry on the Clerk of the General Clerk's Office, who is hereby directed to
reflect the consolidation by appropriately marking the court's records; and it is further
153784/2021 CERROS, MAURICIO vs. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT Page 5 of 6 Motion No. 004
5 of 6 [* 5] INDEX NO. 153784/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 162 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/06/2024
ORDERED that such service upon the Clerk of the General Clerk's Office shall be made
in hard-copy format if this action is a hard-copy matter or, if it is an e-filed case, shall be made in
accordance with the procedures set forth in the aforesaid Protocol; and it is further
ORDERED that counsel are directed to submit a proposed conference order to the Court
via e-mail at SFC-Part33-Clerk@nycourts.gov on or before October 23 , 2024. In the event the
parties are unable to agree to a proposed preliminary conference order, the parties are directed to
appear for an in-person preliminary conference on October 30, 2024 at 10:00 a.m. in 60 Centre
Street, Room 442.
This constitutes the Decision and Order of the Court.
9/6/2024 DATE HON. M y V. ROSADO, J.S.C. CHECK ONE: CASE DISPOSED NON-FINAL DISPOSITION
GRANTED □ DENIED GRANTED IN PART □ OTHER APPLICATION: SETTLE ORDER SUBMIT ORDER
CHECK IF APPROPRIATE : INCLUDES TRANSFER/REASSIGN FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT □ REFERENCE
153784/2021 CERROS, MAURICIO vs. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT Page 6 of 6 Motion No. 004
[* 6] 6 of 6