Cerrato v. Megaro
126 A. 531, 96 N.J. Eq. 722, 11 Stock. 722, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 399
Opinion
' The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Foster.
For affirmance—The Chiee-Justice, Tren chard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays—15. " ■
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cerrato v. Megaro, 126 A. 531, 96 N.J. Eq. 722, 11 Stock. 722, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 399 (N.J. 1924).
126 A. 531 (Cerrato v. Megaro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Neely v. Sheppard
196 S.E. 452 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)