Cerrato v. Cocozza

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cerrato v. Cocozza

192 A.D.2d 635, 598 N.Y.S.2d 729, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3931

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 19, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 192 A.D.2d 635 (Cerrato v. Cocozza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cerrato v. Cocozza, 192 A.D.2d 635, 598 N.Y.S.2d 729, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3931 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover a sum of money which the defendants allegedly owed the plaintiff as guarantors of the debt of Atreus Enterprises Ltd., the defendant Robert V. Cimmino appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Facelle, J.) entered November 20, 1990, as, upon an order of the same court dated October 22, 1990, granting the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, is in favor of the plaintiff and against the appellant in the principal sum of $5,000.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The appellant has failed to raise any triable issues of fact which would preclude the granting of summary judgment (see, CPLR 3212). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Miller, Copertino and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover a sum of money which the defendants allegedly owed the plaintiff as guarantors of the debt of Atreus Enterprises Ltd., the defendant Robert V. Cimmino appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Facelle, J.) entered November 20, 1990, as, upon an order of the same court dated October 22, 1990, granting the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, is in favor of the plaintiff and against the appellant in the principal sum of $5,000.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The appellant has failed to raise any triable issues of fact which would preclude the granting of summary judgment (see, CPLR 3212). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Miller, Copertino and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 A.D.2d 635, 598 N.Y.S.2d 729, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3931, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cerrato-v-cocozza-nyappdiv-1993.