Cerna v. Rhodes
This text of 343 So. 2d 1067 (Cerna v. Rhodes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Felix CERNA, Jr.
v.
Norval J. RHODES et al.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Writ denied. The result is correct.
TATE, J., is of the opinion the result is correct as to the prosecutor because of his prosecutorial immunity. See Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409, 96 S.Ct. 984, 990-92, 47 L.Ed.2d 128 (1976).
DIXON, J., dissents, believing the result in the court below is in error and the writ should be granted.
CALOGERO, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.
DENNIS, J., is of the opinion that the writ should be granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
343 So. 2d 1067, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cerna-v-rhodes-la-1977.