Cermak v. Chicago Bonding & Surety Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Cermak v. Chicago Bonding & Surety Co.

210 Ill. App. 187, 1918 Ill. App. LEXIS 187

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedApril 3, 1918

DocketGen. No. 23,528

StatusPublished

This text of 210 Ill. App. 187 (Cermak v. Chicago Bonding & Surety Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cermak v. Chicago Bonding & Surety Co., 210 Ill. App. 187, 1918 Ill. App. LEXIS 187 (Ill. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Mb. Presiding Justice Taylor

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Replevin, § 206*—when return of household goods of tenant not shown. In an action on a replevin bond, given to secure the return of household furniture seized under a writ of replevin by defendant landlord while in a flat rented by plaintiff of defendant, evidence held insufficient to show a return of the property. 2. Replevin, § 171*—what does not constitute return of household goods of tenant. One who seizes household goods of his tenant under a writ of replevin, and, after an order for return of the goods to the tenant, tells her she can have them and that they are in the flat, and keeps the goods there until the expiration of the lease, when he takes them out and stores them, during all this time keeping the premises locked and paying the rent, does not make a return of the' goods.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mb. Presiding Justice Taylor

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Replevin, § 206*—when return of household goods of tenant not shown. In an action on a replevin bond, given to secure the return of household furniture seized under a writ of replevin by defendant landlord while in a flat rented by plaintiff of defendant, evidence held insufficient to show a return of the property. 2. Replevin, § 171*—what does not constitute return of household goods of tenant. One who seizes household goods of his tenant under a writ of replevin, and, after an order for return of the goods to the tenant, tells her she can have them and that they are in the flat, and keeps the goods there until the expiration of the lease, when he takes them out and stores them, during all this time keeping the premises locked and paying the rent, does not make a return of the' goods.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

210 Ill. App. 187, 1918 Ill. App. LEXIS 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cermak-v-chicago-bonding-surety-co-illappct-1918.