Cermak v. Chicago Bonding & Surety Co.

211 Ill. App. 337, 1918 Ill. App. LEXIS 444
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided May 15, 1918·No. Gen. No. 23,686·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. Replevin, § 152* — when judgment is sufficient. A judgment in a replevin suit complies with, section 22 of the Replevin Act (J. & A. f 9207) and is sufficient to support an action on the bond where it holds, in effect, that the property is held by the defendant in replevin for the payment of money, and orders that unless the amount for which it is so held be paid within twenty days, the property be returned. ,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cermak v. Chicago Bonding & Surety Co., 211 Ill. App. 337, 1918 Ill. App. LEXIS 444 (Ill. Ct. App. 1918).

211 Ill. App. 337 (Cermak v. Chicago Bonding & Surety Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lawer Auto Supply Co. v. Teton Auto Co.
284 P. 1001 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1930)