Cermak v. Cable Piano Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Cermak v. Cable Piano Co.

211 Ill. App. 219

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedMay 13, 1918

DocketGen. No. 23,577

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 211 Ill. App. 219 (Cermak v. Cable Piano Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cermak v. Cable Piano Co., 211 Ill. App. 219 (Ill. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Dever

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Replevin, § 206* — what is effect of affidavit as evidence. The statements in an affidavit filed in a replevin suit as to the value of the property are to be regarded as at least prima facie proof of the value of the property. 5. Replevin, § 192* — when judgment not excessive in action on bond. In an action on a replevin bond, evidence held sufficient to warrant a judgment for plaintiff of $500, attorney’s fees, interest and costs. 6. Replevin, § 206* — what is effect of affidavit as to value of property. A witness signing an affidavit filed in a replevin suit as to the value of the property may not by testimony qualify or modify his statements made therein. 7. Replevin, § 190* — when interest allowed in action on hond. In an action on a replevin bond, interest should be allowed from the time of the taking of the property under the replevin writ to the date of judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Dever

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Replevin, § 206* — what is effect of affidavit as evidence. The statements in an affidavit filed in a replevin suit as to the value of the property are to be regarded as at least prima facie proof of the value of the property. 5. Replevin, § 192* — when judgment not excessive in action on bond. In an action on a replevin bond, evidence held sufficient to warrant a judgment for plaintiff of $500, attorney’s fees, interest and costs. 6. Replevin, § 206* — what is effect of affidavit as to value of property. A witness signing an affidavit filed in a replevin suit as to the value of the property may not by testimony qualify or modify his statements made therein. 7. Replevin, § 190* — when interest allowed in action on hond. In an action on a replevin bond, interest should be allowed from the time of the taking of the property under the replevin writ to the date of judgment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

211 Ill. App. 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cermak-v-cable-piano-co-illappct-1918.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack