Cermak v. Cable Piano Co.

211 Ill. App. 219
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided May 13, 1918·No. Gen. No. 23,577·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Dever

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Replevin, § 206* — what is effect of affidavit as evidence. The statements in an affidavit filed in a replevin suit as to the value of the property are to be regarded as at least prima facie proof of the value of the property. 5. Replevin, § 192* — when judgment not excessive in action on bond. In an action on a replevin bond, evidence held sufficient to warrant a judgment for plaintiff of $500, attorney’s fees, interest and costs. 6. Replevin, § 206* — what is effect of affidavit as to value of property. A witness signing an affidavit filed in a replevin suit as to the value of the property may not by testimony qualify or modify his statements made therein. 7. Replevin, § 190* — when interest allowed in action on hond. In an action on a replevin bond, interest should be allowed from the time of the taking of the property under the replevin writ to the date of judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cermak v. Cable Piano Co., 211 Ill. App. 219 (Ill. Ct. App. 1918).

211 Ill. App. 219 (Cermak v. Cable Piano Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Peters ex rel. Keenon v. Brown
245 Ill. App. 570 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1927)