Cermak ex rel. Staver Carriage Co. v. American Surety Co. of New York

Appellate Court of Illinois

Cermak ex rel. Staver Carriage Co. v. American Surety Co. of New York

202 Ill. App. 42, 1916 Ill. App. LEXIS 825

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided November 14, 1916·No. Gen. No. 21,626·Published

Opinion

Mr! Justice MoGoorty

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. Appeal and ebbob, § 1014*—what essential to review of rulings on propositions of law. In order to enable the Appellate Court to review alleged errors of the trial court in holding propositions of law in a case tried without a jury, it is necessary not only that such propositions shall have been submitted to the trial court, but also that the rulings of the court thereon shall be preserved in the record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr! Justice MoGoorty

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. Appeal and ebbob, § 1014*—what essential to review of rulings on propositions of law. In order to enable the Appellate Court to review alleged errors of the trial court in holding propositions of law in a case tried without a jury, it is necessary not only that such propositions shall have been submitted to the trial court, but also that the rulings of the court thereon shall be preserved in the record.

Cermak ex rel. Staver Carriage Co. v. American Surety Co. of New York, 202 Ill. App. 42, 1916 Ill. App. LEXIS 825 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

202 Ill. App. 42 (Cermak ex rel. Staver Carriage Co. v. American Surety Co. of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.