Cerf v. Morris Glick, Inc.

240 A.D. 777

This text of 240 A.D. 777 (Cerf v. Morris Glick, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cerf v. Morris Glick, Inc., 240 A.D. 777 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, and judgment directed permitting appellant to redeem upon payment to plaintiffs of the sum of $10,000 now on deposit in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings, with costs to appellant. Appellant made several tenders. The first, made on October 30, 1931, was rejected not because of its form evidently, but because it was impossible to obtain the signature of one of the plaintiffs to the assignment, as he was at that time sojourning in Europe. Two other tenders were made shortly thereafter and were rejected for the same reason. On December 3, 1931, having been informed that the assignment was then ready, the appellant, through its representative, made a tender by certified cheek, and this was rejected because it did not include interest from November 1 to December 3, 1931, the date of the last tender. To decree foreclosure because of the failure to include this interest was, we think, highly technical and not warranted by the circumstances. Finding of fact and conclusions of law inconsistent with this decision are reversed and new findings and conclusions will be made. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur; Scudder, J., not voting. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
240 A.D. 777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cerf-v-morris-glick-inc-nyappdiv-1933.