Cereta Hardy v. Lanard Lane
Opinion
Opinion issued July 9, 2019
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-19-00265-CV ——————————— CERETA HARDY, Appellant V. LANARD LANE, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1129179
MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Cereta Hardy, proceeding pro se, has neither paid the required
filing fee nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.851(b), 51.941(a),
101.041(1) (West 2013); Order, Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation,
Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). Furthermore, appellant has failed
to timely file her appellate brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a)(1), (d), 38.8(a)(1).
After the Clerk of this Court’s May 1, 2019 notice warned appellant that her appeal
was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution if she failed to timely pay the filing
fee, and the June 11, 2019 notice warned appellant that her appeal was subject to
dismissal for want of prosecution if she failed to file her appellant’s brief, appellant
failed to timely respond to either notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to
timely pay all required fees and to file an appellant’s brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5,
38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c).
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Kelly, and Goodman.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cereta Hardy v. Lanard Lane (Cereta Hardy v. Lanard Lane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.