Ceres Marine Terminals, Inc. v. DOWCP
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-2407
CERES MARINE TERMINALS, INC.,
Petitioner,
v.
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; ANTHONY K. WALLACE; TARTAN TERMINALS, INCORPORATED; AMERICAN LONGSHORE MUTUAL ASSOCIATION, LTD.,
Respondents.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (14-0124; 14-0124A)
Submitted: July 31, 2015 Decided: August 13, 2015
Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lawrence P. Postol, SEYFARTH SHAW, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Heather H. Kraus, SEMMES, BOWEN, and SEMMES, Baltimore, Maryland; Patrick Marlin Wysong, BERMAN, SOBIN, GROSS, FELDMAN & DARBY, LLP, Lutherville, Maryland; Kathleen Kim, Mark A. Reinhalter, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Ceres Marine Terminals, Inc., seeks review of the Benefits
Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative
law judge’s (“ALJ”) order finding that Ceres is the employer
responsible for payment of temporary total disability benefits
to Anthony K. Wallace, pursuant to 33 U.S.C. §§ 901-950 (2012).
Our review of the record discloses that the ALJ and the Board
applied the proper legal standard, and the ALJ’s decision is
based upon substantial evidence. Accordingly, we deny the
petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ceres Marine Terminals, Inc. v. DOWCP (Ceres Marine Terminals, Inc. v. DOWCP) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.