Ceres Marine Terminals, Inc v. Anita Artis

CourtCourt of Appeals of Virginia
DecidedFebruary 18, 1997
Docket1868961
StatusUnpublished

This text of Ceres Marine Terminals, Inc v. Anita Artis (Ceres Marine Terminals, Inc v. Anita Artis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ceres Marine Terminals, Inc v. Anita Artis, (Va. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Baker, Bray and Overton Argued at Norfolk, Virginia

CERES MARINE TERMINALS, INC. AND AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY CO. MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY v. Record No. 1868-96-1 JUDGE NELSON T. OVERTON FEBRUARY 18, 1997 ANITA ARTIS

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION Robert A. Rapaport (Lynne M. Ferris; Knight, Dudley, Clarke & Dolph, P.L.C., on brief), for appellants.

No brief or argument for appellee.

Ceres Marine Terminals, Inc., (employer) appeals a decision

of the Workers' Compensation Commission that denies it credit for

benefits paid earlier pursuant to an award under the federal

Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (LHWCA). We find

that employer must be given credit for the dollar amounts

previously paid, and we reverse the commission's award.

The parties are fully conversant with the record in the

cause, and because this memorandum opinion carries no

precedential value, no recitation of the facts is necessary.

Employer paid benefits under the LHWCA for temporary total

disability to Anita Artis for a compensable injury she suffered

while in its employ. The Virginia Workers' Compensation

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not

designated for publication. Commission subsequently found a permanent partial disability, and

awarded benefits under the Workers' Compensation Act. See Code

§ 65.2-503. The commission refused to allow employer to offset

this award by the dollar amount of benefits paid under the LHWCA,

claiming that the two types of benefits are different and may not

be credited against one another.

We disagree. In Virginia Int'l Terminals, Inc. v. Moore, 22

Va. App. 396, 470 S.E.2d 574 (1996), we held: Subject to the approval of the commission, an employer is entitled to a credit for any "voluntary payment" it may have made to the employee. As defined by the statute, a payment is "voluntary" if it was not "due and payable" by "the terms of this title" when made. Thus, the disability payments employer paid claimant under the LHWCA were "voluntary" because when paid they were not "due and payable" under "the terms of" the Virginia Act. Therefore, the amounts paid under the LHWCA should have been deducted from employer's liability as determined by the commission. The statute makes no exception to its command, and its language directing that a credit be provided for "any" voluntary payments indicates an intent to provide a credit for all payments that fall within its classification of "voluntary."

Id. at 405, 470 S.E.2d at 578-79. The amounts paid by employer

under the LHWCA should therefore be set off against "any future

liability it may have to claimant for the injury received,"

regardless of the classification of the disability. Id. at 406,

470 S.E.2d at 579.

We reverse and remand, instructing the commission to

determine the dollar amount paid under the LHWCA and to credit

- 2 - employer that amount against the commission's award. Reversed and remanded.

- 3 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Virginia International Terminals, Inc. v. Moore
470 S.E.2d 574 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ceres Marine Terminals, Inc v. Anita Artis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ceres-marine-terminals-inc-v-anita-artis-vactapp-1997.