Cereghino v. Hammer
60 Cal. 235, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 433
This text of 60 Cal. 235 (Cereghino v. Hammer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cereghino v. Hammer, 60 Cal. 235, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 433 (Cal. 1882).
Opinion
The parties evidently had in contemplation the net proceeds. It will not be presumed that the guarantor assumed an obligation beyond the amount which should be by him received from the crop, clear of incidental expenses. It was for plaintiff to establish that the condition had happened which made defendant liable—that there were proceeds.
Judgment and order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bagley v. Cohen
50 P. 4 (California Supreme Court, 1897)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
60 Cal. 235, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cereghino-v-hammer-cal-1882.