Cereghino v. Hammer
60 Cal. 235, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 433
Opinion
The parties evidently had in contemplation the net proceeds. It will not be presumed that the guarantor assumed an obligation beyond the amount which should be by him received from the crop, clear of incidental expenses. It was for plaintiff to establish that the condition had happened which made defendant liable—that there were proceeds.
Judgment and order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cereghino v. Hammer, 60 Cal. 235, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 433 (Cal. 1882).
60 Cal. 235 (Cereghino v. Hammer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bagley v. Cohen
50 P. 4 (California Supreme Court, 1897)