Cerday v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Cerday v. State

1930 OK CR 138, 287 P. 1114, 47 Okla. Crim. 37, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 339

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 29, 1930

DocketNo. A-7272.

StatusPublished

This text of 1930 OK CR 138 (Cerday v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cerday v. State, 1930 OK CR 138, 287 P. 1114, 47 Okla. Crim. 37, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 339 (Okla. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Cotton county on a charge of having unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $150 and to serve 40 days in the county jail.

Judgment was rendered in September, 1928, and the appeal was lodged in this court in January, 1929. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed. The competent evidence offered by the state does not present a strong case, but ;we are not prepared to say that it is insufficient to sustain the verdict and judgment. Defendant did not take the stand and offered no testimony. No fundamental error is apparent.

The case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Cotton county on a charge of having unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $150 and to serve 40 days in the county jail.

Judgment was rendered in September, 1928, and the appeal was lodged in this court in January, 1929. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed. The competent evidence offered by the state does not present a strong case, but ;we are not prepared to say that it is insufficient to sustain the verdict and judgment. Defendant did not take the stand and offered no testimony. No fundamental error is apparent.

The case is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1930 OK CR 138, 287 P. 1114, 47 Okla. Crim. 37, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cerday-v-state-oklacrimapp-1930.