Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. v. United States

20 Ct. Int'l Trade 336, 917 F. Supp. 839, 1996 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 55, 18 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1896
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 853 F. Supp. 431
United States Court of International Trade·Decided March 1, 1996·No. Court No. 95-05-00636·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Musgrave, Judge:

Upon consideration of the Appellate Court’s decision in Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. v. United States, 64 F.3d 1579 (Fed. Cir. 1995), and plaintiffs consent motion, it is hereby

Ordered that the U.S. Department of Commerce instruct the U.S. Customs Service to refund any estimated countervailing duties that were deposited with the U.S. Customs Service during the period January 1, 1990 through December 31, 1990, with respect to ceramic tile from Mexico manufactured by Cerámica Regiomontana, S.A., covered by entries that remained unliquidated at the close of business on October 17,1995, together with interest calculated as provided by 19 U.S.C. § 1677g.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. v. United States, 20 Ct. Int'l Trade 336, 917 F. Supp. 839, 1996 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 55, 18 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1896 (cit 1996).

20 Ct. Int'l Trade 336 (Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related