Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. v. United States

16 Ct. Int'l Trade 393
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 853 F. Supp. 431
United States Court of International Trade·Decided May 19, 1992·No. Court No. 88-05-00394·Published

Opinion

AMENDED JUDGMENT

Musgrave, Judge:

The Court, on its own initiative, hereby amends its Judgment of May 15, 1992, to state:

This case having been duly submitted for decision, and the Court, after due deliberation, having rendered a decision herein; now, in conformity with said decision,

It is hereby ordered, adjudged and decreed: That Count One of plaintiffs complaint is dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies; and it is further

Ordered, adjudged and decreed: The case is remanded to the ITAto recalculate the countervailing duty rate for Cerámica Regiomontana, S.A., Industrias Intercontinental, S.A., and all other firms without specified individual rates, based on a weighted average of all companies investigated, including those whose individual rates are de minimis or zero or otherwise significantly different from the resulting countrywide rate; it is further

Ordered, adjudged and decreed: That the ITA shall file with the Court a report of the results of remand in this case no later than sixty days 40from the date of this Amended Judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. v. United States, 16 Ct. Int'l Trade 393 (cit 1992).

16 Ct. Int'l Trade 393 (Ceramica Regiomontana, S.A. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.