Cerame v. Town of Irondequoit

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cerame v. Town of Irondequoit

19 A.D.3d 1065, 796 N.Y.S.2d 296, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6331

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 10, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 19 A.D.3d 1065 (Cerame v. Town of Irondequoit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cerame v. Town of Irondequoit, 19 A.D.3d 1065, 796 N.Y.S.2d 296, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6331 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Andrew V. Siracuse, J.), entered March 30, 2004. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted plaintiffs motion for an order enjoining defendants Samuel J. Soporito and Joyce Soporito (incorrectly sued herein as Samuel J. Saporito and Joyce Saporito), during the pendency of this action, from interfering with gas and water lines that burden their real property and benefit plaintiffs property.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for the reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court. Present—Pigott, Jr., RJ., Scudder, Gorski, Martoche and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Andrew V. Siracuse, J.), entered March 30, 2004. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted plaintiffs motion for an order enjoining defendants Samuel J. Soporito and Joyce Soporito (incorrectly sued herein as Samuel J. Saporito and Joyce Saporito), during the pendency of this action, from interfering with gas and water lines that burden their real property and benefit plaintiffs property.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for the reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court. Present—Pigott, Jr., RJ., Scudder, Gorski, Martoche and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 A.D.3d 1065, 796 N.Y.S.2d 296, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cerame-v-town-of-irondequoit-nyappdiv-2005.