Ceralde v. Equifax Information Services, LLC

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided May 14, 2025·No. 2:25-cv-00306·Unknown

Opinion

1 Michael Yancey III, NV Bar No. 16158 CONSUMER JUSTICE LAW FIRM PLC 2 2300 West Sahara Avenue, Suite 800 3 Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 Phone: (480) 573-9272 4 Fax: (480) 613-7733 Email: myancey@consumerjustice.com 5 6 Consumer Justice Law Firm 7 8095 N. 85th Way Scottsdale, AZ 85258 8 9 Attorney for Plaintiffs 10 Mark and Anna Ceralde 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 14 MARK CERALDE and ANNA CERALDE, Case No.: 2:25-cv-306-JCM-MDC 15 Plaintiffs, 16 JOINT MOTION FOR ENTRY OF v. PROTECTIVE ORDER 17 19 Defendant. 20 21 22 Plaintiffs Mark and Anna Ceralde (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Equifax Information 23 Services, LLC (Defendant), collectively referred to as “the Parties”, pursuant to Federal Rule of 24 Civil Procedure 26(c)(1)(G), move for entry of a Protective Order in the form attached as Exhibit 25 A. 26 This is an action arising out of alleged violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. The 27 Parties are engaged in discovery, specifically depositions and production of documents in this 28 1 case pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Many of the documents expected to be 2 produced in this case contain confidential and proprietary information that could be used by 3 Defendant’s competitors to gain an unfair advantage. The Parties therefore respectfully request 4 the entry of the attached Protective Order to protect information already disclosed or information 5 to be disclosed in the future in the discovery process. 6 Memorandum of Law 7 Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 26(c), a protective order should be 8 granted when the moving party establishes "good cause" for the order and justice requires that a 9 protective order issue "to protect a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, 10 or undue burden or expense . . . ." Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c). A motion for protective order may be 11 made by "a party or by the person from whom discovery is sought." Id. The burden of showing 12 that good cause for the protective order exists is on the moving party. In order to establish good 13 cause, the moving party "must show a particular and specific need for the protective order, as 14 opposed to making stereotyped or conclusory statements." Gray v. First Winthrop Corp., 133 15 F.R.D. 39, 40 (N.D. Cal. 1990). Even if good cause for a protective order is shown, "the court 16 must still balance the interests in allowing discovery against the relative burdens to the parties 17 (and nonparties)." See Advanced Semiconductor Materials Am., Inc. v. Applied Materials, Inc., 18 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21459, *8 (N.D. Cal. 1996); 19 In re Wilkerson v. Riffage, No. C-03-04926 RMW, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34115, at *8-9 (N.D. 20 Cal. Dec. 17, 2004) 21 Here, the information that will likely be sought in discovery as this case progresses may 22 include information about Defendant’s processes for receiving, maintaining, and evaluating 23 confidential consumer and background check information. Rather than burdening the Court and 24 delaying discovery in this case by objecting to disclosure of such information and requiring a 25 document-by-document review to determine confidentiality, the Parties seek an umbrella 26 protective order which permits them to designate certain information as confidential. In the event 27 that any party to this litigation disagrees at any point in these proceedings with any designation 28 1 made under this Protective Order, the Parties shall first try to resolve such dispute in good faith 2 on an informal basis. If the dispute cannot be resolved, the party objecting to the designation 3 may seek appropriate relief from this Court. 4 For the foregoing reasons, the Parties respectfully request the entry of the attached 5 Protective Order. 6 7 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 13th day of May 2025. 8 By://Michael Yancey III By: /s/ Gia N. Marina 9 Michael Yancey III, NV Bar No. 16158 GIA N. MARINA 2300 West Sahara Avenue, Suite 800 Nevada Bar No. 15276 10 Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 1700 South Pavilion Center Drive, Suite 500 11 Phone: (480) 573-9272 Las Vegas, Nevada 89135 Fax: (480) 613-7733 E-mail: gmarina@clarkhill.com 12 Email: myancey@consumerjustice.com Telephone: (702) 862-8300; Fax: (702) 778-9709 13 Consumer Justice Law Firm 8095 N. 85th Way CLARK HILL PLLC 14 Scottsdale, AZ 85258 15 Attorney for Plaintiffs Attorney for Defendant 16 Mark and Anna Ceralde Equifax Information Services LLC 17 18 I hereby certify that on May 13, 2025, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk 20 of the Court using the ECF system, which will send notice of such filing to all attorneys of 21 record in this matter. Since none of the attorneys of record are non-ECF participants, hard copies 22 of the foregoing have not been provided via personal delivery or by postal mail. 23 CONSUMER JUSTICE LAW FIRM 24 By: /s/Amanda Dakroub 25 Amanda Dakroub 26 27 28 1 Yancey Michael Yancey III, NV Bar No. 16158 CONSUMER JUSTICE LAW FIRM PLC 2 2300 West Sahara Avenue, Suite 800 3 Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 Phone: (480) 573-9272 4 Fax: (480) 613-7733 Email: myancey@consumerjustice.com 5 6 Consumer Justice Law Firm 7 8095 N. 85th Way Scottsdale, AZ 85258 8 9 Attorney for Plaintiffs 10 Mark and Anna Ceralde 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 14 MARK CERALDE and ANNA CERALDE, Case No.:2:25-cv-306-JCM-MDC 15 Plaintiffs, v. 17 19 Defendant. 20 21 The Parties to this action have agreed to the terms of this Protective Order accordingly; it 22 is ORDERED 23 1 Definitions. As used in this protective order: (a) “attorney” means an attorney who has appeared in this action or is an employee 24 25 of any name firm and actively assisting an attorney of record in the matter; 26 (b) “confidential” means a document reasonably designated as confidential under 27 this protective order; 28 1 (c) A party or non-party disclosing or producing a document may designate it as 2 confidential if the party or non-party reasonably contends that it contains confidential 3 or proprietary information. 4 (d) A party or non-party may designate a document as confidential by 5 6 conspicuously marking each page with the word “confidential.” Deposition 7 testimony may be designated as confidential: 8 (1) after the deposition, by notifying the parties and those who were present 9 at the deposition within 21 days after the deposition transcript becomes 10 available, unless otherwise agreed. 11 (e) If a witness is expected to testify as to confidential or proprietary information, a 12 party or non-party may request that the witness’s deposition be taken in the 13 14 presence of only those persons entitled to receive confidential documents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ceralde v. Equifax Information Services, LLC, (D. Nev. 2025).

Ceralde v. Equifax Information Services, LLC (Ceralde v. Equifax Information Services, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related