CEQUENT TOWING PRODUCTS, INC. v. Loyd

District Court of Appeal of Florida

CEQUENT TOWING PRODUCTS, INC. v. Loyd

11 So. 3d 999, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8612, 2009 WL 1741376

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 22, 2009

Docket1D09-0513

StatusPublished

This text of 11 So. 3d 999 (CEQUENT TOWING PRODUCTS, INC. v. Loyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

CEQUENT TOWING PRODUCTS, INC. v. Loyd, 11 So. 3d 999, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8612, 2009 WL 1741376 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We withdraw our original opinion and substitute the following.

In response to the petition for writ of certiorari, Respondents John A. Loyd, as Father and Personal Representative of the Estate of Jonathan Andrew Loyd, deceased, and Doris M. Loyd, as Mother and Personal Representative of the Estate of Tony Clayton McDonald, deceased, concede the relevant period for discovery of Petitioner’s documents is January 1, 2000, through May 7, 2006. These respondents have offered to provide staffing to conduct the discovery which would be subject to the confidentiality provisions of the protective order. This obviates the need for the court to review the order.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

BARFIELD, WEBSTER, and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We withdraw our original opinion and substitute the following.

In response to the petition for writ of certiorari, Respondents John A. Loyd, as Father and Personal Representative of the Estate of Jonathan Andrew Loyd, deceased, and Doris M. Loyd, as Mother and Personal Representative of the Estate of Tony Clayton McDonald, deceased, concede the relevant period for discovery of Petitioner’s documents is January 1, 2000, through May 7, 2006. These respondents have offered to provide staffing to conduct the discovery which would be subject to the confidentiality provisions of the protective order. This obviates the need for the court to review the order.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

BARFIELD, WEBSTER, and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 So. 3d 999, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8612, 2009 WL 1741376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cequent-towing-products-inc-v-loyd-fladistctapp-2009.