Cepulonis v. Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional Institution, Cedar Junction

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Cepulonis v. Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional Institution, Cedar Junction

814 N.E.2d 1097, 442 Mass. 1027, 2004 Mass. LEXIS 581

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedSeptember 20, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 814 N.E.2d 1097 (Cepulonis v. Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional Institution, Cedar Junction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cepulonis v. Superintendent, Massachusetts Correctional Institution, Cedar Junction, 814 N.E.2d 1097, 442 Mass. 1027, 2004 Mass. LEXIS 581 (Mass. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Richard Cepulonis appeals from the denial of his petition, pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3, by a single justice of this court. In his petition, he sought an order [1028]*1028“staying or enjoining” enforcement of a Superior Court order (dismissing his complaint in an underlying civil action) pending appeal to the Appeals Court. Similar relief was sought and denied in the Superior Court and in the Appeals Court.

The case was submitted on briefs. Nancy Ankers White, Special Assistant Attorney General, & Daryl F. Glazer for the defendant. Richard Cepulonis, pro se.

While this appeal has been pending, the Appeals Court issued a memorandum and order pursuant to its rule 1:28 affirming the Superior Court’s order and the final judgment dismissing Cepulonis’s complaint. Cepulonis v. Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Inst., Cedar Junction, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 1108 (2004). The relief requested in this case, therefore, is academic. Nadheerul-Islam v. Commonwealth, 438 Mass. 1004, 1005 (2002). Cepulonis’s appeal is moot. Id.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richard Cepulonis appeals from the denial of his petition, pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3, by a single justice of this court. In his petition, he sought an order [1028]*1028“staying or enjoining” enforcement of a Superior Court order (dismissing his complaint in an underlying civil action) pending appeal to the Appeals Court. Similar relief was sought and denied in the Superior Court and in the Appeals Court.

The case was submitted on briefs. Nancy Ankers White, Special Assistant Attorney General, & Daryl F. Glazer for the defendant. Richard Cepulonis, pro se.

While this appeal has been pending, the Appeals Court issued a memorandum and order pursuant to its rule 1:28 affirming the Superior Court’s order and the final judgment dismissing Cepulonis’s complaint. Cepulonis v. Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Inst., Cedar Junction, 57 Mass. App. Ct. 1108 (2004). The relief requested in this case, therefore, is academic. Nadheerul-Islam v. Commonwealth, 438 Mass. 1004, 1005 (2002). Cepulonis’s appeal is moot. Id.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

814 N.E.2d 1097, 442 Mass. 1027, 2004 Mass. LEXIS 581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cepulonis-v-superintendent-massachusetts-correctional-institution-cedar-mass-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack