Cephas v. Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc.

177 F. App'x 310
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 24, 2006
DocketNo. 05-2415
StatusPublished

This text of 177 F. App'x 310 (Cephas v. Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cephas v. Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc., 177 F. App'x 310 (4th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Derrick André Cephas appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendant on his Title VII and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2000) claims of employment discrimination based on race and retaliation. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e—2000e-17 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cephas v. Pepsi Bottling Group, No. CA-04-2269-WMN (D.Md. Dec. 6, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Definitions
42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
177 F. App'x 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cephas-v-pepsi-bottling-group-inc-ca4-2006.