Cephas v. Maryland Rural Development Corp. Board of Directors

Fourth Circuit

Cephas v. Maryland Rural Development Corp. Board of Directors

452 F. App'x 401

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 2, 2011·No. No. 11-1079·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles T. Cephas appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cephas v. Md. Rural Dev. Corp., No. 1:10-cv-00813-JFM (D.Md. Dec. 10, 2010). We deny as moot Appellee Brooks’ motion to strike Cephas’ reply briefs. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles T. Cephas appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cephas v. Md. Rural Dev. Corp., No. 1:10-cv-00813-JFM (D.Md. Dec. 10, 2010). We deny as moot Appellee Brooks’ motion to strike Cephas’ reply briefs. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cephas v. Maryland Rural Development Corp. Board of Directors, 452 F. App'x 401 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

452 F. App'x 401 (Cephas v. Maryland Rural Development Corp. Board of Directors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.