Cepero (Billy) Vs. State

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided August 16, 2019·No. 79184·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

BILLY CEPERO, No. 79184 Appellant,

VS.

THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED

Respondent. AU6 1 6 2019 BRO

CLET;OF S REME COURT

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL [EPUTYCLERK

This is a pro se appeal from a "denial to the motion for sentencing transcripts of 6-5-19." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Douglas W. Herndon, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a motion requesting transcripts of a sentencing hearing, this court lacks jurisdiction. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

J.

--41t4241"2 Parraguirre 6.*V.""ilim Cadish

cc: Hon. Douglas W. Herndon, District Judge Billy Cepero Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

q- 3402

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cepero (Billy) Vs. State, (Neb. 2019).

Cepero (Billy) Vs. State (Cepero (Billy) Vs. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castillo v. State
792 P.2d 1133 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)