Cepero (Billy) Vs. State

CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 16, 2019
Docket79184
StatusPublished

This text of Cepero (Billy) Vs. State (Cepero (Billy) Vs. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cepero (Billy) Vs. State, (Neb. 2019).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

BILLY CEPERO, No. 79184 Appellant, VS. THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED Respondent. AU6 1 6 2019 BRO CLET;OF S REME COURT • ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL [EPUTYCLERK

This is a pro se appeal from a "denial to the motion for sentencing transcripts of 6-5-19." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Douglas W. Herndon, Judge. Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a motion requesting transcripts of a sentencing hearing, this court lacks jurisdiction. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

J. --41t4241"2 Parraguirre 6.*V.""ilim Cadish

cc: Hon. Douglas W. Herndon, District Judge Billy Cepero Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

q- 3402

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Castillo v. State
792 P.2d 1133 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Cepero (Billy) Vs. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cepero-billy-vs-state-nev-2019.