Cepeda v. Hertz Corp.

112 A.D.2d 91
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 18, 1985
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 112 A.D.2d 91 (Cepeda v. Hertz Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cepeda v. Hertz Corp., 112 A.D.2d 91 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinions

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Frank S. Rossetti, J.), entered on July 16, 1984, reversed on the law and the facts, without costs or disbursements, and a new trial ordered solely on the issue of damages unless plaintiff, within 20 days after service upon his attorney of a copy of the order to be entered herein, serves and files in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the judgment in his favor to $450,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith. If plaintiff so stipulates, the judgment, as so amended and reduced, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

After review of the record herein, the damages appear to us to be excessive to the extent indicated.

Appeal from the order of said court entered on May 31, [92]*921984 granting defendant’s motion to set aside the jury verdict to the extent of ordering a new trial on the issue of damages unless plaintiff stipulates to reduce the verdict to $750,000 is dismissed as subsumed in the appeal from the aforesaid judgment, without costs. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Ross and Lynch, JJ. Milonas and Ellerin, JJ., dissent in part in a memorandum by Milonas, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cepeda v. Hertz Corp.
141 A.D.2d 394 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 A.D.2d 91, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cepeda-v-hertz-corp-nyappdiv-1985.